Lauren represents clients in civil and criminal appeals in Massachusetts and New Mexico, including family law, business, and post-conviction matters. She also assists attorneys nationwide with appellate brief writing and strategy in complex appeals across both state and federal courts. Her services include record review, appellate brief drafting, legal research, issue spotting, and strategic consultation. In addition to appellate work, Lauren prepares dispositive motions and responses—such as motions for summary judgment, motions to dismiss, and related oppositions—and has experience drafting arbitration briefs in complex commercial matters.

Whether you are a client seeking appellate representation or an attorney seeking support, the same qualities matter: proven appellate experience, excellent legal writing and research skills, and sound judgment in identifying and framing issues on appeal. A strong appellate lawyer understands the unique standards of appellate review, communicates clearly, and approaches each case with objectivity and precision. Lauren offers all of these strengths, delivering high-quality, court-ready briefs and thoughtful appellate strategy for both direct clients and partnering attorneys.

Turnaround time depends on the scope and complexity of each case. Lauren is known for her efficiency and reliability, often delivering work ahead of internal and court deadlines. She leverages her extensive appellate experience and legal technology to streamline every stage of the process. Timelines vary depending on the type of filing—such as an opening brief, answer brief, reply, petition for review, or post-judgment motion—the size of the record, and the number and novelty of issues involved. Clients receive clear estimates and regular updates throughout the process.

Yes. Lauren responsibly incorporates vetted, legal-specific AI tools to improve efficiency and maintain the highest quality in her work—without compromising ethics, accuracy, or confidentiality. All AI-assisted research and content is independently verified. Her use of AI is fully aligned with the ABA Model Rules and Formal Opinion 512:

Rule 1.1 (Competence): She understands the capabilities and limitations of each tool and carefully reviews all output for legal accuracy.

Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality): Lauren does not input sensitive information into AI platforms and uses only tools that do not store or train on user data.

Rule 1.4 (Communication): Lauren informs hiring attorneys of the tools she utilizes. If AI meaningfully impacts a project, she consults with the hiring attorney.

Rule 1.5 (Fees): She charges reasonably for time spent using and reviewing AI output, but not for learning the tools.

Lauren uses only legal-industry-grade AI tools, including: Westlaw Precision, CoCounsel, Midpage AI, vLex, ClearBrief, and Adobe Acrobat AI. 

Lauren offers flexible and transparent fee structures for both clients and attorneys. For clients, fees are determined based on the scope and complexity of the case, the length of the record, and the number and novelty of issues involved. Depending on the matter, payment may be arranged on an hourly basis, a flat-fee basis, or through an installment plan. Lauren works with each client to identify a structure that balances predictability, fairness, and the needs of the case. For attorneys, she provides contract appellate services—from a single motion to a full appeal—on either a flat or hourly basis, offering high-level support without the cost of full-time staffing. In every engagement, Lauren provides a consultation and written estimate outlining the expected time, scope, and cost before work begins.

In jurisdictions where she is not licensed, Lauren provides behind-the-scenes appellate support—research, brief drafting, and strategy consulting—under the supervision of the hiring attorney, who is licensed in the relevant jurisdiction. She does not sign pleadings, appear in court, advise clients, or contact opposing counsel. This model complies with the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct, including:

Rule 1.1 (Competence): Lawyers may delegate work if they are competent to supervise and ensure quality.

Rule 1.5 (Fees): Attorneys may charge clients for contract lawyer services at a reasonable market rate (see ABA Formal Opinion 00-420).

Rule 5.3 (Supervision): This applies to lawyers working in a supporting role across jurisdictions. Supervising attorneys must ensure that outsourced work—whether done by a nonlawyer or a lawyer not barred in the jurisdiction—is compatible with professional obligations.

Rule 5.5 (Unauthorized Practice): This rule does not prohibit a licensed attorney from another jurisdiction from providing support under supervision, so long as the delegating lawyer retains full responsibility. (See Comment to Model Rule 5.5.)

Lauren is a licensed attorney who operates strictly in a non-appearing capacity when supporting lawyers outside her licensed jurisdictions. Her role is structured to comply with the ethical requirements of each state while helping attorneys access specialized appellate support efficiently and responsibly.

Even experienced trial attorneys benefit from bringing in appellate counsel. Appeals require a different mindset, skill set, and approach—focused on the written record, legal error, and persuasive briefing. An appellate lawyer offers a fresh perspective and a deep understanding of how appellate judges analyze cases. They can more objectively evaluate the trial record, spot viable issues, and craft focused, strategic arguments tailored to appellate review standards. Hiring appellate counsel also allows trial lawyers to continue managing their caseload while ensuring their clients receive specialized attention at the appellate stage. Lauren regularly supports attorneys in this role—partnering with them to protect their record, strengthen their arguments, and increase the likelihood of success on appeal.